[Discussion] Three Decades of Unfulfilled Promises: The US, UK, and Russia's Commitment to Ukraine & A Free World

[Uncrowned Guard]

Ukraine's Nuclear Appeal: A Failed Bargain for Safety

Three decades ago, Ukraine committed to a decision of faith and honor, trading its nuclear arsenal for a promise of immunity — security assurances handed over by the U.S., the U.K., and Russia. Fast forward to today, the guarantee of peace has given way to a contentious battle, with Russia breaching its vow and conquering Ukrainian land, causing concern for global stability.

The Budapest Memorandum: The Promise Unfulfilled

On Dec 5, 1994, the Budapest Memorandum, a pivotal agreement, was inked promising Ukraine's sovereignty and independence. Ukraine intended to accede to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and, in exchange, the U.S., the U.K., and Russia committed to abstaining from economic and military aggression against Ukraine.

Yet, a mere two decades after the pact's formation, Russia launched a war against the very state it had pledged to shield, occupying Crimea and parts of Eastern Ukraine. Today, 30 years after Ukraine tendered its nuclear defenses, Russia wages a full-scale offensive against the country, resulting in devastating nationwide destruction and loss of innocent lives.

On its 30th anniversary, Ukraine's Ministry of Foreign Affairs dubbed the Budapest Memorandum as "a monument to short-sightedness in strategic security decision-making," warning Euro-Atlantic leaders of the failure inherent in crafting European security at Ukraine's expense.

The Irony of Bargaining Nuclear Defense

Post the Soviet Union's fall, Ukraine inherited a significant stockpile of nuclear weaponry, including 176 intercontinental ballistic missiles and up to 4,200 tactical nuclear warheads, holding the world's third-largest nuclear potential. Despite its nuclear status, Ukraine felt pressured into relinquishing its arsenal in a bid for promised security.

Ukraine dutifully fulfilled its commitment by 1996, transferring all nuclear warheads to Russia for destruction. The guarantors, however, grossly fell short of their obligations.

Interestingly, not all experts regard Ukraine's disarmament unfavorably. Arguments suggest Ukraine's lack of weapon launch codes rendered its arsenal more of a resource drain than an asset. Maintaining the nuclear weapons, which Ukraine could store but not use, demanded substantial funds. Moreover, holding on to the stockpile could have potentially isolated Ukraine internationally, akin to Iran or North Korea.

To balance the narrative, Ukraine did receive economic benefits from its denuclearization, particularly during the financial crisis of the early 90s. The disarmament allowed Ukraine to offset some of its gas debts by surrendering its strategic bombers.

Budapest Memorandum: A Shadow of Broken Promises

As the echo of the Budapest Memorandum reverberates into the present day, President Volodymyr Zelensky raises a new question — should Ukraine reconsider nuclear weapons as a self-defense measure or be part of an effective alliance such as NATO?

Hoffman and Horovitz, defense experts, voice their skepticism on the idea of Ukraine's pursuit of nuclear weapons. Practical challenges such as the lack of proper infrastructure to handle uranium enrichment or plutonium separation, the International Atomic Energy Agency's nuclear material tracking, and potential military and political repercussions make the proposition a tricky venture.

Nonetheless, amidst the chaos and threat brought upon by the war, Liagusha contends that Ukraine has little left to lose and must consider the option in its defense efforts. Although the controversy continues to brew, it is clear that Ukraine's story is a tale of trust betrayed under the facade of security promises, shedding light on the long-lasting impacts of short-sighted decision-making in global politics.

View full article